Cover of Body-build and its inheritance

Body-build and its inheritance

  • Free to read
  • 6 hours to read
  • 5 chapters

"Body-build and its inheritance" by Charles Benedict Davenport is a scientific publication written in the early 20th century. It investigates how human body-build—especially the contrast between slender and fleshy types—varies through growth and across populations, and to what extent these differences arise from heredity rather than environment. Drawing on large family records, statistical analyses, and standardized measurements, it develops indices of build and examines patterns across sex, race, geography, and age. The work is a data-rich treatise for readers interested in anthropometry, growth, and genetic inheritance. The opening of the work sets out the motivation from wartime army anthropology: striking diversity in young men’s physiques prompted a focused inquiry into the hereditary basis of build. The preface outlines abundant family data, measurement conventions (e.g., weight/height notation and chest-girth adjustments), and acknowledgments to contributors, then the contents preview three major parts on definition and development, mass heredity studies, and detailed family matings. Davenport begins by clarifying popular terms for slimness and fleshiness, defining two kinds of variation (ontogenetic change versus adult fluctuation), and proposing chest-girth relative to stature as the core index; because adult chest data are often missing, weight is used as a proxy. Early results show only a small average difference between male and female indices, while racial and geographic contrasts are pronounced. He then assembles multi-source measurements to trace the ontogenetic curve: infants are relatively “chubby” at birth, dip briefly, then progressively slenderize until about 12 years before broadening again through adolescence (more in boys), with adult weight typically rising into middle age; actuarial tables are introduced to adjust youthful measures for comparison with parents.

Read free now No app, no sign-up. Your place is saved automatically. Or download for your e-reader ↓
  • Heredity
  • Human anatomy

Read the opening

Part I

BUILD, ITS DEFINITION AND ITS ONTOGENY.

A. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS.

If a hundred men of about the same stature be compared, it is seen that they vary greatly in weight. At the same time they vary in form, and especially in bulk. This variation is popularly recognized by the variety of terms applied to build. It may be of interest to pause a moment to consider popular terminology relating to build. We have, first, terms expressing a marked deviation below the normal build. We speak of persons as “slender,” “thin,” “gaunt,” “slim,” “slight,” “spare,” “lank,” and “spindling.” These terms are not exactly synonyms. “Lank” implies angularity; “gaunt” connotes the ravage of disease; “thin” connotes a loss of weight; “slight” connotes lightness and smallness of bone; “spindling” is used especially of youth in the period of rapid growth preceding adolescence; “slim” has a faint connotation of insufficiency; “slender” best expresses the idea which we shall want to use in this work where we have a relatively small interest in stature and where we wish to avoid connotation of disease, developmental changes, etc. In other languages there exists a series of terms which similarly differ slightly in connotation. Thus, in French, there is “maigre,” in German “mager,” which often connote a loss of weight through disease, “dünn,” which connotes loss of a former more nearly average weight, and “schlank,” which is close to the English “slender.” On the other hand, the English language contains a variety of terms applicable to deviation in build above the average. Thus we have the words “stout,” “portly,” “fleshy,” “corpulent,” “thick-set,” “obese,” “chubby,” and “fat.” The word “stout” usually carries a connotation of vigor. The term “portly” connotes large size with a tendency to excessively great circumference. “Fleshy” is nearly synonymous with “portly” but has less connotation of majesty of size. “Corpulent” usually carries a connotation of abdominal enlargement. “Thick-set” implies a large bony frame. “Obese” frequently connotes excessive, strictly pathological, increase of build. “Chubby” is applied especially to infants. “Fat” connotes excessive production of fat in the body, as opposed to an unusually large muscular development. Perhaps of all of these terms “fleshy” is as satisfactory as any as an expression for build without connotation in respect to degree or source of great weight, whether due to fat, muscle, or bone. In the German language there are the terms, “plump,” and “schwerfällig,” which serve to express large build. In the French language there are the terms, “gros,” “obese,” and “embonpoint,” which is near to the English equivalent “stout” or “fleshy.” In the present work the term “fleshy” is used, despite its slight suggestion of muscular development merely, largely because it begins with a different letter from slender. The word “slender” will be used for the other extreme of build. It has been found convenient to indicate those terms by their initial letters “S” and “F” respectively.

Keep reading Body-build and its inheritance →

Contents

  1. Preface
  2. Part I
  3. Part II
  4. Part III
  5. Appendix

Download for your e-reader

Files are provided by Project Gutenberg. On a Kindle, the simplest route is to send the EPUB with Amazon’s Send to Kindle. Downloaded copies don’t sync with your place on Classic Book Reader.

About this edition

This free edition of Body-build and its inheritance by Charles Benedict Davenport comes from Project Gutenberg eBook #78107, released 2026-03-04. It is in the public domain in the United States, so you can read it here in full at no cost, on any phone, tablet or computer.

Summary provided by Project Gutenberg (automatically generated).

More by Charles Benedict Davenport